Social Security Planning
What Does Dave Ramsey Say About Social Security at 62? A Fiduciary Advisor's View
Ramsey's position is more nuanced than most headlines suggest. Here is what he actually says, where fiduciary advisors agree, and what the decision truly depends on for professionals in Minnesota.
Direct Answer
Does Dave Ramsey Advise Against Claiming Social Security at 62?
Dave Ramsey generally advises against claiming Social Security at 62 because of the permanent benefit reduction, but his position is conditional. He has stated that claiming at 62 may be appropriate in specific circumstances, particularly when an individual has substantial investment savings and does not need to depend on a maximized Social Security benefit. For most people, however, Ramsey's guidance aligns with the fiduciary standard: claiming early at 62 triggers a reduction of up to 30% compared to full retirement age for those born in 1960 or later, according to the Social Security Administration, and that reduction is permanent.
At New Horizons Boutique Financial Services, our team, which includes advisors holding FINRA Series 65, Series 66, and Series 7 registrations along with an MBA and B.S. in Economics, takes a strategy-first approach to this question. General guidance from any commentator, including Dave Ramsey, is a starting point, not a complete strategy. The optimal claiming age depends on your health, your spouse's benefit, your other income sources, your Minnesota state tax situation, and your broader retirement income plan.
The Numbers
What Claiming at 62 Actually Costs You
According to the Social Security Administration, the reduction for claiming at 62 instead of full retirement age (67 for those born in 1960 or later) is approximately 30%. That reduction is permanent and applies to every monthly payment for the rest of your life, including future cost-of-living adjustments. The exact dollar impact varies based on your individual earnings history. The table below illustrates how the reduction works across hypothetical full-retirement-age benefit amounts. Individual results will differ.
| Claiming Age | Approx. Reduction vs. FRA (Age 67) | Monthly Benefit on $2,000 FRA Example | Monthly Benefit on $3,000 FRA Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | Approx. 30% | ~$1,400 | ~$2,100 |
| 64 | Approx. 20% | ~$1,600 | ~$2,400 |
| 67 (FRA) | 0% (baseline) | $2,000 | $3,000 |
| 70 | +24% (delayed credits) | ~$2,480 | ~$3,720 |
Source: SSA.gov. Figures are illustrative based on SSA reduction percentages and are not projections of your individual benefit. Your actual benefit depends on your lifetime earnings record. Delayed retirement credits increase benefits by approximately 8% per year from FRA to age 70, per SSA guidelines.
30%
Max Permanent Reduction at 62 vs. FRA for Those Born in 1960 or Later (SSA)
8%
Annual Benefit Increase for Each Year Delayed Past FRA, Up to Age 70 (SSA)
$22,320
2026 Earnings Limit Before Benefits Are Reduced if Claiming Before FRA (SSA)
The Fiduciary Perspective
When Claiming Social Security at 62 May Make Sense
Ramsey's conditional openness to early claiming, and the fiduciary advisor's agreement with it in specific scenarios, centers on one core principle: the decision must fit your individual situation. Below are the circumstances where claiming at 62 may be appropriate, along with the trade-offs each involves.
Health Concerns and Reduced Life Expectancy
If a significant health condition meaningfully reduces your expected lifespan, claiming earlier may result in greater total lifetime benefits. This is not a decision to make without guidance, as it involves projecting benefit totals across different longevity assumptions, a calculation that requires careful analysis rather than a general rule.
For professionals retiring before 65, bridging healthcare coverage is a related decision that often intersects with claiming timing. Learn more about healthcare planning for early retirees in Minnesota.
The Break-Even Analysis
A break-even analysis compares cumulative lifetime benefits under different claiming ages. For many individuals, the break-even point between claiming at 62 versus 67 falls approximately between ages 77 and 80, depending on your specific benefit amounts. If you do not expect to live past that threshold, early claiming may produce more cumulative income. If you expect to live into your mid-80s or beyond, delaying typically results in significantly more total income over a lifetime.
Substantial Investment Portfolio and Lower Dependence on SS
This is the specific scenario Ramsey has cited as a possible exception. When an individual has enough invested assets to fund retirement independently, the relative impact of a 30% Social Security reduction is smaller. Some financial plans involve drawing from a portfolio earlier and using Social Security at 62 as supplemental income rather than a primary source. Each of these strategies involves trade-offs related to sequence-of-returns risk, tax planning, and estate considerations — factors that are central to a comprehensive financial independence planning strategy.
Spousal Claiming Coordination
In some married households, one spouse claiming at 62 while the higher earner delays to 70 may be a coordinated strategy to maximize survivor benefits and household income. This approach requires careful modeling of spousal benefit amounts, age differences, and expected longevity for both individuals. It is one of the more complex claiming decisions and benefits directly from professional guidance.
Minnesota-Specific Factors
How Minnesota's Social Security Tax Rules Affect Your Claiming Decision in 2026
Minnesota is one of a small number of states that taxes Social Security benefits at the state level. As of the 2026 tax year, Minnesota provides a Social Security income subtraction for qualifying taxpayers, but benefits above the exemption threshold remain subject to Minnesota income tax. This is a factor that many national commentators, including Ramsey, do not address when discussing claiming age, and it can materially affect when it makes sense to begin benefits.
According to Minnesota's Social Security income subtraction rules (Minnesota Department of Revenue), for tax year 2025 (the most recently published figures), the Social Security income subtraction begins to phase out at $105,380 in provisional income for married filing jointly filers and $82,190 for single filers. These thresholds are adjusted periodically. For 2026, consult the Minnesota Department of Revenue or work with a tax-informed advisor for the current figures. Claiming Social Security at 62 may add income at an age when combined income from part-time work, pensions, or portfolio withdrawals could push you above the phase-out threshold, resulting in a larger Minnesota tax bill on benefits that are already permanently reduced.
Minnesota Social Security Tax Considerations in 2026
-
1Minnesota taxes Social Security above income thresholds, unlike most states
-
2Early claiming at 62 may overlap with other taxable income sources, reducing the net benefit
-
3Delaying Social Security while drawing down pre-tax retirement accounts first may reduce combined taxable income in later years
-
4Roth conversion strategy during the gap years (62 to 67 or 70) may reduce future Social Security taxation. Explore tax planning strategies for high earners.
-
5Federal provisional income rules also apply: up to 85% of SS benefits may be federally taxable above $44,000 (MFJ), per IRS guidelines
Source Note
Minnesota Social Security subtraction thresholds: Minnesota Department of Revenue (revenue.state.mn.us). Federal provisional income rules: IRS Publication 915. Thresholds are subject to annual adjustment. Verify current-year figures with a qualified tax professional or the applicable agency before making claiming decisions.
Two Perspectives Compared
Dave Ramsey's Guidance vs. a Fiduciary Advisor's Approach
Ramsey provides broad financial education to millions of people simultaneously. A fiduciary advisor's job is to develop a strategy around your specific situation. The table below compares how each approach addresses the Social Security claiming question.
Understanding what "fiduciary" actually means matters before this comparison can land. If you are unfamiliar with the term, our plain-language guide to what a fiduciary financial advisor is provides a helpful starting point.
| Factor | Ramsey's General Guidance | Fiduciary Advisor Approach (New Horizons BFS) |
|---|---|---|
| Default Recommendation | Delay past 62; avoid early claiming in most cases | Analyze your specific situation before any recommendation |
| Health and Longevity | Acknowledged as a factor in exceptional cases | Modeled explicitly using break-even projections tailored to the client |
| Tax Planning | General guidance; no state-specific tax modeling | Coordinates claiming age with MN tax thresholds, Roth conversion, and RMD timing |
| Spousal Strategy | Mentioned but not modeled for the individual | Optimized for both spouses using survivor benefit and income sequencing analysis |
| Investment Coordination | Suggests large portfolio reduces dependence on SS timing | Integrates Social Security into a comprehensive income distribution plan |
For a deeper look at how the fiduciary standard compares to a broker relationship, see our full guide: Independent Fiduciary Advisor vs. Broker.
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions About Social Security Claiming Age
Does Dave Ramsey Recommend Taking Social Security at Age 62?
Ramsey's position is conditional. He generally discourages claiming at 62 due to the approximately 30% permanent benefit reduction for those born in 1960 or later. However, he has indicated that claiming at 62 can be appropriate if someone has significant investment savings and does not rely heavily on Social Security for retirement income. His position is not a blanket prohibition, but rather a caution against claiming early out of impatience or convenience rather than strategy.
At What Age Is Social Security No Longer Taxed?
There is no age at which Social Security benefits automatically become tax-free under federal law. Federal taxation of benefits is based on provisional income (adjusted gross income plus tax-exempt interest plus 50% of Social Security benefits), not age. Up to 85% of benefits may be subject to federal income tax above $44,000 in provisional income for married filing jointly filers, per IRS Publication 915. In Minnesota, a state-level Social Security income subtraction applies, but it phases out above income thresholds set by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. Working with an advisor to manage provisional income through withdrawal sequencing and Roth conversions may help reduce the taxable portion of your benefits over time.
How Do You Get $3,000 a Month From Social Security?
Receiving $3,000 or more per month from Social Security requires a combination of a strong earnings history and strategic claiming. According to SSA data, the average retired worker benefit as of late 2025 was approximately $1,975 per month. Reaching $3,000 per month generally requires a full career of above-average earnings and claiming at or near full retirement age (67) or delaying to age 70 to take advantage of delayed retirement credits. There is no guaranteed pathway to a specific monthly benefit because the amount depends entirely on your 35 highest-earning years as recorded by the SSA. Viewing your personalized Social Security statement at ssa.gov/myaccount provides your estimated benefit at different claiming ages based on your actual earnings record.
What Is the Smartest Way to Claim Social Security?
The smartest claiming strategy is the one tailored to your complete financial picture, not a general rule. Key factors include your health and family longevity history, whether you are married and your spouse's benefit eligibility, your other sources of retirement income (pensions, 401(k), IRA), your Minnesota state tax situation, and whether delaying would be funded by portfolio withdrawals or continued employment. For many professionals approaching retirement, delaying to 67 or 70 produces the highest lifetime income when longevity is likely. For others, coordinated spousal claiming or early claiming under specific portfolio conditions may be more effective. A fiduciary advisor at New Horizons BFS can model these scenarios for your specific situation before any decision is made.
Why Shouldn't I Take My Social Security at 62?
Claiming at 62 triggers the maximum permanent benefit reduction under current SSA rules, approximately 30% for those born in 1960 or later. That reduction applies to every payment for life, including future cost-of-living adjustments. If you live into your late 70s or beyond, the cumulative lifetime income from delaying is typically significantly higher. Additionally, claiming early while still working can trigger the earnings test, which temporarily reduces benefits if your earnings exceed the annual limit (approximately $22,320 in 2026, per the SSA). However, there are legitimate scenarios where claiming at 62 may be appropriate. The key is making the decision based on a full analysis rather than default or convenience.
Our Approach
A Strategy-First Approach to Social Security from New Horizons BFS
The advisors at New Horizons Boutique Financial Services hold FINRA Series 7, 63, 65, and 66 registrations and are life and health insurance licensed. Our team includes an MBA and a B.S. in Economics from the University of Minnesota. We serve executives, professionals, and business owners in Lake Elmo, Stillwater, and Woodbury, and across the broader Twin Cities metro area, who are preparing to transition from active careers into financial independence.
Social Security claiming is one component of a retirement income strategy, not a standalone decision. We evaluate it alongside your portfolio withdrawal sequence, tax exposure, health insurance bridge, estate plan, and income floor requirements. Every recommendation begins with a clear strategy. No templates. No product-first solutions. Our approach to Social Security is grounded in a complete retirement planning framework — read our guide to retirement planning in Minnesota for context on how these decisions connect.
We intentionally limit the number of clients we serve so that every relationship receives the time and attention it requires. If you are within five to ten years of retirement and have not yet built a claiming strategy, a conversation costs nothing — or explore our Social Security Claiming Strategy guide to go deeper before we speak.
What a Social Security Strategy Review Includes
-
✓Break-even analysis at multiple claiming ages
-
✓Spousal and survivor benefit coordination
-
✓Minnesota state tax impact modeling
-
✓Coordination with portfolio withdrawals, RMDs, and Roth conversion timing
-
✓Integration with your full retirement income distribution plan
-
✓Review of your full retirement income distribution plan, including Social Security timing
This analysis is led by Lars Engman, MBA, and the New Horizons BFS advisory team.
Serving Professionals Across the Twin Cities
Lake Elmo, Stillwater, Woodbury, Afton, Bayport, Cottage Grove, Hastings, Arden Hills, Apple Valley, Anoka, Andover, Albertville, Alexandria, Belle Plaine, Austin, and St. Paul.
Continue Your Research
Related Guides from New Horizons BFS
Social Security claiming does not exist in isolation. These guides cover the decisions that directly connect to when and how you claim.
Social Security Claiming Strategy: A Guide for Pre-Retirees
The full hub guide covering every major claiming decision, from break-even analysis to spousal and survivor benefit coordination.
Read the guideMinnesota State Taxes on Retirement Income
How Minnesota taxes Social Security, pensions, and IRA withdrawals — and what that means for your income strategy in retirement.
Read the guideRetirement Planning in Minnesota: What Professionals Need to Know
A comprehensive look at building a retirement plan that addresses income, taxes, healthcare, and estate considerations in Minnesota.
Read the guideRetirement Income Distribution Planning in Minnesota
How to sequence withdrawals from your portfolio, Social Security, and other income sources to maximize net income and minimize taxes.
Read the guideTax Planning Strategies for High-Income Individuals
Roth conversions, RMD timing, and tax-efficient withdrawal strategies that intersect directly with the Social Security claiming decision.
Read the guideHealthcare Planning for Early Retirees in Minnesota (Ages 55-64)
Bridging healthcare coverage between early retirement and Medicare at 65 — a decision that often runs parallel to Social Security timing.
Read the guideStay Connected
Follow New Horizons BFS for Ongoing Retirement Insights
We regularly publish educational content on Social Security, retirement income, tax strategy, and financial independence planning for professionals across Minnesota. Follow us to stay current as rules change and new planning opportunities emerge.
Watch on YouTube
Our YouTube channel features short-form educational videos on retirement planning, Social Security strategy, tax optimization, and financial independence. A practical resource for professionals who want to understand the decisions ahead before sitting down with an advisor.
Visit Our YouTube ChannelTake the Next Step
Your Social Security Strategy Should Be Built Around You, Not a General Rule
Whether you are leaning toward claiming at 62 or delaying to 70, the right answer depends on your complete financial picture. The advisors at New Horizons BFS can help you model the options and build a strategy designed around your situation, your health, your tax exposure, and your income needs in retirement.
New Horizons Boutique Financial Services, 8647 Eagle Point Blvd. Suite #1, Lake Elmo, MN. Call (763) 401-1035.