Retirement Planning Insights
What Is the Biggest Mistake in Retirement Planning?
The biggest mistake in retirement planning is treating retirement as a single event rather than a multi-year transition. Successful professionals who have spent decades accumulating wealth often fail to coordinate their withdrawal strategy, tax planning, Social Security timing, and benefit elections into a single, integrated plan before they stop working. This coordination gap, not under-saving, is what most commonly undermines an otherwise well-funded retirement.
Take the Financial Independence AssessmentThe Wealth Transition Problem
Most successful professionals do not have a wealth accumulation problem. They have a wealth transition problem. After decades of maxing out 401(k) contributions, building equity in employer stock, and accumulating assets across multiple accounts, the challenge is not whether they have enough. The challenge is whether those assets are positioned, coordinated, and sequenced to support a retirement that may last 25 to 35 years.
The most consequential mistake is not any single decision. It is the failure to coordinate decisions across tax strategy, investment management, Social Security claiming, equity compensation, healthcare planning, and estate planning into one unified framework. When these decisions are made in isolation, by different professionals, at different times, and without a central strategy, the result is often higher lifetime taxes, inefficient withdrawals, and missed opportunities that cannot be recovered once the window closes.
According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute's 2026 Retirement Confidence Survey, approximately 61% of American workers feel confident they will have enough money to live comfortably throughout retirement, down from 67% in 2025 and the lowest level since 2017. Yet many of those confident workers lack a written plan that coordinates their various financial elements. This disconnect between confidence and actual preparedness is exactly what the coordination gap produces: a sense of readiness that dissolves when the transition begins.
The Coordination Gap
What Happens When Decisions Are Made in Isolation
A senior executive at a Minnesota company may have a 401(k), vested RSUs, a deferred compensation plan, a taxable brokerage account, and a spouse with their own retirement savings. Each of these accounts has different tax treatment, different withdrawal rules, and different timing constraints. When each is managed separately, the interactions between them go unaddressed. Roth conversions in low-income years may trigger unexpected Medicare IRMAA surcharges. Deferred compensation distributions may push the household into a higher tax bracket just as Social Security begins. Equity compensation vesting events may create large, unplanned tax liabilities in the year before retirement.
These are not hypothetical scenarios. They are the predictable consequences of uncoordinated planning, and they are largely irreversible once executed. Timing errors on Social Security claiming, Roth conversion amounts, or deferred compensation elections cannot be undone after the tax year closes.
7 Mistakes That Undermine Otherwise Well-Funded Retirements
These mistakes are not about under-saving. They are about the failure to coordinate decisions that interact with each other in ways most professionals never see until the consequences appear on a tax return or a Medicare premium notice.
Treating Retirement as an Event, Not a Transition
Retirement is not a single day. It is a multi-year transition that typically spans 5 to 10 years before and after leaving the workforce. The decisions made during this window, including when to stop working, when to claim Social Security, when to start Roth conversions, and how to handle equity compensation, interact with each other in ways that can either preserve or erode wealth. Treating each as a separate, one-time decision rather than part of a coordinated sequence is the foundational mistake that makes every other mistake more likely. Working with a retirement planning professional in Minnesota may help you structure this transition rather than react to it.
Claiming Social Security Without Coordinating Other Income Sources
Claiming Social Security at 62 results in a permanent benefit reduction of up to 30% compared to full retirement age. For married couples, the decision affects spousal benefits and survivor benefits as well. Yet many professionals claim early because they want the income, without considering how deferred compensation distributions, pension elections, or nonqualified deferred compensation payouts could fill the income gap instead. The coordination question is not just when to claim, but how claiming interacts with every other income source in the year it begins.
Ignoring the Pre-RMD Window (Ages 60 to 73)
For most professionals, required minimum distributions begin at age 73 under the SECURE 2.0 Act. The years between retirement and age 73 may represent a temporary income gap where earned income has stopped or declined, Social Security may not have started, and RMDs have not yet begun. This creates a narrow window where taxable income may be lower than at any other point in retirement, which may present an opportunity to convert traditional IRA or 401(k) assets to a Roth IRA at a lower effective tax rate. Failing to use this window is one of the most commonly missed tax planning opportunities. Learn more about RMD strategy and Roth conversion planning to understand how this window works.
Leaving Equity Compensation Decisions to Default Timelines
Executives with RSUs, stock options, or restricted stock awards often allow vesting and exercise decisions to follow default company schedules rather than coordinating them with their retirement timeline. A large RSU vesting event in the year before retirement can push taxable income into the highest bracket, trigger additional Medicare IRMAA surcharges in a future year, and create a tax liability that could have been managed with earlier planning. For professionals with equity compensation, the timing of vesting events, exercise decisions, and stock sales should be coordinated with retirement income planning, not left to chance.
Failing to Coordinate Account Types for Withdrawal Sequencing
Most successful professionals have assets spread across taxable brokerage accounts, traditional 401(k) and IRA accounts, Roth IRA accounts, and possibly deferred compensation plans. Each account type is taxed differently, has different withdrawal rules, and affects Medicare premiums and tax brackets differently. Without a coordinated withdrawal sequence, retirees may pull from the wrong account at the wrong time, paying more in taxes than necessary and accelerating the depletion of tax-advantaged assets. Tax optimization planning coordinates these withdrawal decisions to manage lifetime tax burden, though results vary by individual circumstances.
No Contingency Structure for Healthcare Before Medicare
Retiring before age 65 creates a healthcare coverage gap between employer-sponsored insurance and Medicare eligibility. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Medicare.gov), Medicare eligibility begins at age 65. Professionals who retire at 60, 61, or 62 must fund their own coverage through COBRA, private market plans, or structured HSA distributions. Without a planned funding source, healthcare costs in this gap can force premature withdrawals from investment accounts, potentially triggering tax consequences and accelerating portfolio depletion. This gap should be planned for years in advance, not addressed in the weeks before retirement.
Estate Planning as an Afterthought
Estate planning documents, beneficiary designations, and trust structures are often created once and never updated to reflect changes in retirement strategy. For Minnesota residents, the state estate tax exemption remains $3 million per person as of 2026, well below the federal exemption. Estates above this threshold may owe Minnesota estate tax, making coordinated planning between retirement income strategy and estate structure essential. Beneficiary designations on 401(k), IRA, and life insurance accounts should be reviewed in coordination with any estate planning updates, as these designations typically override instructions in a will.
How a Strategy-First Approach Addresses These Mistakes
A strategy-first approach means building a comprehensive financial picture before making any product decisions. Each recommendation begins with a clear understanding of how your accounts, income sources, tax situation, and estate plan interact. Products, if any, follow the strategy, never the other way around.
This approach is designed to address the coordination gap directly. Instead of making decisions about Social Security, Roth conversions, equity compensation, and estate planning in separate conversations with different professionals at different times, a strategy-first process integrates these decisions into a single framework. The goal is not to predict the future but to build a structure that adapts as life and markets evolve.
Our team at New Horizons Boutique Financial Services, including Lars Engman (MBA) and Alec Engman (B.S. Economics, University of Minnesota), holds FINRA Series 7, Series 63, Series 65, and Series 66 registrations, along with Life and Health Insurance licensing. We work with executives, business owners, and professionals nearing retirement across the Twin Cities metro, building financial independence planning strategies designed to coordinate the decisions that matter most during this transition.
What Strategy-First Coordination Includes
- 1 Analysis of all accounts, income sources, and tax positions before any recommendations
- 2 Withdrawal sequencing across taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts
- 3 Social Security claiming strategy coordinated with deferred comp and pension elections
- 4 Roth conversion planning within the pre-RMD window, calibrated to tax brackets and IRMAA thresholds
- 5 Equity compensation timing coordinated with retirement transition and tax year planning
- 6 Estate planning and beneficiary review synchronized with the income strategy
- 7 Ongoing quarterly reviews to adapt as tax laws, markets, and personal circumstances change
Minnesota-Specific Retirement Planning Considerations
Minnesota residents face retirement planning challenges that require specialized coordination. The state taxes Social Security benefits for higher earners, with partial exclusions phasing out as income rises. For tax year 2025, Social Security becomes fully taxable for Minnesota purposes when adjusted gross income exceeds approximately $144,320 for married filing jointly and approximately $120,490 for single filers, with 2026 thresholds expected to be modestly higher due to inflation indexing. This means that Roth conversion income or deferred compensation distributions that increase AGI could also increase the portion of Social Security subject to Minnesota tax.
Minnesota's estate tax exemption remains $3 million per person as of 2026, well below the federal estate tax exemption. For professionals with retirement assets, real estate, and life insurance, this threshold can be reached quickly without coordinated planning. The state also taxes most retirement income, including traditional 401(k) and IRA distributions, at ordinary income rates up to 9.85% as of 2026. Detailed information on how Minnesota taxes each type of retirement income is available in our Minnesota retirement tax guide.
Key Minnesota Planning Factors for 2026
- State income tax rates from 5.35% to 9.85% on retirement distributions (Minnesota Department of Revenue, 2026)
- Social Security taxable for higher earners above approximately $144,320 AGI (married filing jointly)
- Estate tax exemption at $3 million per person, not indexed for inflation
- RMD age 73 under SECURE 2.0 for individuals born 1951 to 1959
- Medicare IRMAA surcharges begin at $218,000 MAGI (married filing jointly, 2024 tax year base for 2026 coverage)
Sources: Minnesota Department of Revenue; Minnesota House Research Department; IRS SECURE 2.0 guidance; CMS Medicare IRMAA tables. Figures as of 2026.
Your Next Step
Are You Coordinated for Retirement?
If the biggest mistake is failing to coordinate your transition, the first step is understanding where you stand today. Our Financial Independence Assessment is designed for successful professionals who want to know how close they are to financial independence and what decisions may matter most before retirement.
It takes a few minutes. There is no cost and no obligation. You will receive a personalized snapshot of your readiness, potential gaps, and the decisions that could matter most in the years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Is the #1 Regret of Retirees?
According to the EBRI 2026 Retirement Confidence Survey, approximately 40% of retirees report that their living expenses are higher than expected, including housing, healthcare, and discretionary spending. Higher-than-expected expenses are among the most commonly cited sources of retirement regret, followed by retiring earlier than planned due to health issues or job disruption, and concerns about Social Security and Medicare benefit reductions. These regrets often stem from the coordination gap described above: expenses were not modeled against actual income sources before retirement began.
What Is the #1 Reported Mistake Related to Planning for Retirement?
The most commonly reported mistake related to retirement planning is failing to develop a coordinated strategy that integrates tax planning, withdrawal sequencing, Social Security timing, and benefit elections before retirement begins. Many professionals have accumulated sufficient assets but have never positioned those assets for the transition from accumulation to distribution. This coordination failure is what makes every other mistake, from claiming Social Security too early to ignoring the pre-RMD window, more likely and more costly.
What Is Dave Ramsey's Warning on Social Security?
Dave Ramsey has warned against claiming Social Security at age 62, noting that early claiming results in a permanent benefit reduction of up to 30% compared to waiting until full retirement age. The underlying principle, that early claiming reduces lifetime benefits, is broadly consistent with Social Security Administration guidance. However, the optimal claiming age depends on individual circumstances, including life expectancy, spousal benefits, and other income sources. For a detailed analysis, see our article on what Dave Ramsey says about Social Security at 62 from a fiduciary perspective.
How Many Americans Have $1,000,000 in Retirement Savings?
A relatively small percentage of American households have $1 million or more in retirement savings. According to EBRI data, the median retirement account balance for households approaching retirement is significantly below this threshold, though averages are skewed higher by a small number of large accounts. For successful professionals who have already reached or exceeded this level, the question shifts from "do I have enough?" to "is what I have positioned correctly for the transition?" That is the coordination question this article addresses.
How Do I Know if My Retirement Planning Lacks Coordination?
Signs include making financial decisions in isolation, lacking a written comprehensive plan, or being unable to explain how your various accounts and strategies work together. If you cannot clearly articulate how your 401(k), IRA, equity compensation, insurance, and estate planning support a unified withdrawal and tax strategy, coordination may be missing. The Financial Independence Assessment is designed to surface these gaps.
When Should I Start Coordinating My Retirement Transition?
The ideal time to begin coordination is 5 to 15 years before your target retirement date. This allows sufficient time to implement Roth conversion strategies, plan equity compensation timing, adjust account positioning, and structure healthcare coverage for any pre-Medicare gap. However, even if you are within five years of retirement, coordinating your existing assets and developing an integrated withdrawal and tax strategy can still meaningfully affect your outcome.
What Are the 5 Biggest Risks in Retirement?
The five most commonly identified retirement risks are: (1) longevity risk, the possibility of outliving your assets; (2) sequence-of-returns risk, the danger that market declines early in retirement disproportionately affect portfolio longevity; (3) inflation risk, the erosion of purchasing power over a 25 to 35 year retirement; (4) healthcare cost risk, including unexpected long-term care needs and pre-Medicare coverage gaps; and (5) tax policy risk, the potential for future tax law changes to affect withdrawal strategy and after-tax income. A coordinated plan is designed to address each of these risks, though no strategy can eliminate them entirely.
Strategy Before Products
Don't Let the Coordination Gap Define Your Retirement
If you have spent decades building wealth, the question is not whether you have enough. It is whether what you have is positioned for the transition ahead. Our boutique approach ensures every aspect of your financial plan, from tax strategy to withdrawal sequencing to estate coordination, works together toward your financial independence.
Or call us at (763) 401-1035 to speak with our team directly.
Serving professionals across Lake Elmo, Stillwater, Woodbury, Arden Hills, and the Twin Cities metro. Looking for a fiduciary advisor in Woodbury?